<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pornpundit Registers Porn Review Objection!</title>
	<link>http://pornblog.sirrodney.com/2005/03/26/pornpundit-registers-porn-review-objection/</link>
	<description>This is the porn review blog for Sir Rodney, the internet's authority on porn quality and value.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Rodney</title>
		<link>http://pornblog.sirrodney.com/2005/03/26/pornpundit-registers-porn-review-objection/#comment-32</link>
		<author>Sir Rodney</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pornblog.sirrodney.com/2005/03/26/pornpundit-registers-porn-review-objection/#comment-32</guid>
					<description>I think I am going to call you PP on this board, because you are so pissed off by porn you don't like. I love that. 

We mildly disagree about Beautiful Agony, PP, but I appreciate you trying to stir up controversy with your provocative headlines and pot shots at your pal (and employer). I hope this works increase readership here in the obscurity of our little blog... 

Anyway, what PP says is true, I gushed about this site beause for christ's sake don't you get bored with the same old porn after a while.  However, you misrepreent me because I also clearly see the downside of an conceptual art site like this one: "the experience is very repetitive. Once you appreciate the subjects' two or three minutes of beautiful agony, there is nowhere to go with your half on. There is no porn here". Read whole review and judge for yourself. 

Anyway, I say definatly, where else can you see the faces of hundreds of regular folks (some quite beautiful) in the throes of orgasm? It's hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I am going to call you PP on this board, because you are so pissed off by porn you don&#8217;t like. I love that. </p>
<p>We mildly disagree about Beautiful Agony, PP, but I appreciate you trying to stir up controversy with your provocative headlines and pot shots at your pal (and employer). I hope this works increase readership here in the obscurity of our little blog&#8230; </p>
<p>Anyway, what PP says is true, I gushed about this site beause for christ&#8217;s sake don&#8217;t you get bored with the same old porn after a while.  However, you misrepreent me because I also clearly see the downside of an conceptual art site like this one: &#8220;the experience is very repetitive. Once you appreciate the subjects&#8217; two or three minutes of beautiful agony, there is nowhere to go with your half on. There is no porn here&#8221;. Read whole review and judge for yourself. </p>
<p>Anyway, I say definatly, where else can you see the faces of hundreds of regular folks (some quite beautiful) in the throes of orgasm? It&#8217;s hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pornpundit</title>
		<link>http://pornblog.sirrodney.com/2005/03/26/pornpundit-registers-porn-review-objection/#comment-33</link>
		<author>pornpundit</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2005 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://pornblog.sirrodney.com/2005/03/26/pornpundit-registers-porn-review-objection/#comment-33</guid>
					<description>Hi Sir Rodney.

yes  I'm trying to "stir the pot".  I did read it from start to finish and choose to ignore faint criticism in favor of overwhelming praise"  Hey look If i got bored with all the stuff I look at I wouldn't be much use ROFL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sir Rodney.</p>
<p>yes  I&#8217;m trying to &#8220;stir the pot&#8221;.  I did read it from start to finish and choose to ignore faint criticism in favor of overwhelming praise&#8221;  Hey look If i got bored with all the stuff I look at I wouldn&#8217;t be much use ROFL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
